Lily : My only downside is the 16 megapixel images. The files are large, and to upload them to an online photo service takes more time than my previous Sony. A 6.5 meg picture is a lot of megapixels. Clear, sharp, absolutely, but my previous camera with 14meg was just as clear. The good thing is you don't need to shoot in the 16meg mode. You can reduce it to 10, and even further down. I would have wished the gap from 16 to 10 wouldn't have been so distant from each other. A 12meg setting would have been a better choice.
Ashley Mott (United States) : I have a current generation smart device that I was using to take pictures prior to receiving this camera, and I will probably continue to use it for snappy pictures since I usually have it right beside me. However, the flash and image optimization can leave a bit to be desired at times, and this camera avoids that *in most instances*.
I'm generally a very pale person, and I have a hard time with point-and-shoot and smart phone cameras leaving me with white ghost face, but the automatic image optimization and flash adjustment of the Sony actually left me looking the way I look in the mirror. Ditto for my husband, though his problem isn't paleness -- cameras usually just make his wrinkles look more prominent than they are because of a hot flash -- this doesn't.
Anonymous : I had a Panasonic Lumix briefly last year and returned it because it was overkill for a point-and-shoot and required too much work to take good pictures consistently. If I wanted that kind of trouble, I would invest in a DSLR and dedicate time to learning how to operate it properly. I don't want that. I have only ever been interested in point-and-shoots that let me get the picture I want within a few shots if I'm doing something posed or that will take nice pictures for reproduction as 4 by 6 (and occasionally 8 by 10) prints for a scrapbook. This camera does that.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét